Končar D&ST Proposes EUR 79.54 DPS

At the share price before the announcement, this would amount to a DY of 3.68% for regular and 3.98% for preferred shares. The ex-date is yet to be announced.

Končar D&ST published a document on the Zagreb Stock Exchange in which the Company proposed the distribution of profit for the year 2024. Of the net profit of EUR 107m, EUR 66.4m will be transferred to retained earnings, while the remaining amount, EUR 40.7m will be paid out as dividends. This represents a payout ratio of 38%.

At the share price before the announcement, the dividend yield amounted to 3.68% for regular and 3.98% for preferred shares. The dividend is subject to approval at the GSM, and the ex-date is yet to be announced.

Končar D&ST further notes that this represents an increase of 151% over the last year’s dividend (EUR 31.75 DPS). In the graphs below, we are giving you an overview of the historic movement of the Company’s dividend per share and dividend yield.

Končar D&ST dividends per share (EUR) and dividend yield (2015 – 2025, %)

Source: Končar D&ST, InterCapital Research

InterCapital
Published
Category : Flash News

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

Valamar Riviera Proposes EUR 0.24 DPS

At the share price before the announcement, this would amount to a DY of 4.3%. Ex-date is set for 17 June 2025.

According to the statement released by Valamar Riviera yesterday, Valamar Riviera’s Supervisory and Management Boards propose the distribution of profit for 2024 with a dividend amounting to EUR 0.24 per share. This indicates a dividend yield of 4.3%. Ex-date is set for 17 June 2025. Finally, the payment date is set for 25 June 2025.

Dividend per share (EUR) & dividend yield (%) (2015 – 2025)

InterCapital
Published
Category : Flash News

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

Stablecoins 102

Stablecoins can resemble a “narrow bank” or a 100% reserve bank, a well-known payment-only banking structure that monetary economists have studied for more than half a century. Built in this manner, stablecoins resemble currency boards as they tie a foreign currency to the dollar and maintain dollar reserves to support redemption commitments. The objective of stablecoins is to mimic the safe asset features of commercial bank money. However, to realize those advantages, stablecoins need to fill the gap between them and commercial bank money: strong, consistent oversight and regulation along with suitable public safety nets. Robust regulation, along with deposit insurance and the additional public backing that accompanies it, is what renders bank deposits an acceptable and recognized form of currency. Strong oversight, combined with deposit insurance and other public support that comes with it, is what makes bank deposits an acceptable form of money. Currently, stablecoins do not have that oversight, and this lack poses risks. This 2nd piece aims to explore the safety and soundness of stablecoins and the need for a clear regulatory regime for stablecoins in the United States.

FRAGMENTATION – At this moment, most popular blockchains are distinct from each other, resulting in a fragmented digital realm. Companies aiming to expand across blockchains are pursuing technical solutions for cross-chain interoperability. Will this eventually turn out to be efficient, or will there be several rivaling ecosystems that we witness, as today? Alternatively, a stablecoin market featuring a high degree of interoperability could support a variety of stablecoin issuers and blockchain networks, providing consumers with a choice in stablecoins and technologies. The fragmentation concerning the use and acceptance of stablecoins will hinder scaling efforts and influence the development of stablecoin use cases. The more people will accept a stablecoin, the more convenient a stablecoin will be (more utility – network effect). Fragmentation in regulation, more specifically, the emergence of different global stablecoin regulatory regimes, creates the potential for conflicting regulation domestically and internationally. This regulatory fragmentation might complicate the ability of U.S. dollar stablecoin issuers to compete on a worldwide level. Scale is essential for any payment method to reach its maximum potential. For instance, according to Europe’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, stablecoin issuers can generate interest from their reserve assets as part of their business strategy, while alternative regulatory frameworks under consideration would mandate that reserves for stablecoins considered systemically significant be maintained as non-interest-earning central bank deposits, restricting stablecoin issuers to a certain business model. At the national level, state regulators have played a crucial role in the growth of the stablecoin market, with many states currently working on establishing state laws or completing new regulations concerning stablecoin issuance. There is a possibility that state regulations might clash, which could hinder the use of the same stablecoin in all states and limit its scalability. Similar to the dual banking system in the United States, a collaborative approach involving both state and federal regulators can foster innovation while also realizing the economies of scale associated with a unified set of market regulations. Various regulatory frameworks are establishing different reserve assets and redemption terms for stablecoin issuers, leading to additional possible fragmentation of the regulatory regime. In Europe, non-systemic issuers must maintain at least 30 percent of their backing assets in bank deposits, and regulators have also suggested limits on concentration per bank. This is unlike the requirements of certain issuers regulated by U.S. states. To compete on a global level, issuers of stablecoins must issue the same stablecoin across various regimes, each with distinct reserve asset and redemption criteria. Establishing consistency at the federal level may enable federal officials to engage in discussions with international counterparts to ensure that global regulations benefit U.S. consumers and businesses, positioning the U.S. as a regulatory leader for an asset class primarily valued in its national currency.

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE – Following years of ambiguity, regulation for stablecoins is now increasingly progressing in Congress. Three rival bills—the GENIUS Act, the STABLE Act, and an unnamed suggestion from Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA)—are contesting to shape the future of digital currencies in the U.S. This long-awaited push for defining regulation could decide if stablecoins can evolve into a common financial instrument or stay stuck in regulatory uncertainty. Earlier this month, the Senate Banking Committee moved forward with the GENIUS Act, achieving an 18–6 bipartisan vote, representing the most important progress toward a federal framework for stablecoins. The legislation characterizes a “payment stablecoin” as any cryptocurrency utilized for payments or settlements, whereby the issuer must redeem it for a predetermined amount of U.S. dollars. Both the GENIUS ACT and the STABLE ACT create the initial federal licensing structures for stablecoins in the U.S. The GENIUS Act sets licensing, reserve, and disclosure obligations while emphasizing consumer rights in bankruptcy situations. It oversees both bank and nonbank issuers, maintaining a balance between state and federal regulation. Issuers with a market cap of over $10 billion, such as Tether and Circle, are required to adhere to OCC and Federal Reserve regulations, whereas smaller issuers can choose state oversight. Nevertheless, an important difference is that the STABLE Act imposes a two-year pause on the issuance of new “endogenously collateralized stablecoins”—ones solely backed by other digital assets—unless they were already in existence prior to the bill’s enactment.

Significantly, the GENIUS ACT classifies payment stablecoin issuers as financial entities according to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, mandating them to maintain customer confidentiality and safeguard private personal data. According to the GENIUS ACT, stablecoins that gain regulatory approval must be supported by high-quality liquid US assets, such as treasury bills and insured deposits. The dual regulatory framework set up by these bills is essential. The legislation enables industry participants to innovate at their own speed by balancing federal and state oversight while ensuring regulatory protections are in place.

The Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released guidance to clarify when specific stablecoins might not be classified as securities according to federal securities laws. This progress occurs as Congress is currently reviewing bills — specifically the GENIUS Act and the STABLE Act — that would clearly exclude payment stablecoins from securities definitions and create an all-encompassing federal regulatory system for payment stablecoins. The timing indicates that the SEC is trying to offer provisional clarity as legislative solutions are still awaiting resolution.

Stablecoins vs. Traditional Payment Processors

Source: Visa, Mastercard, ARK Invest Big Ideas 2025 Report

Petar Klarić
Published
Category : Blog

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

How Uncertainty Fuels Volatility – And the Lessons That Can Be Away Taken From It

The last couple of weeks, if not months, could be described as nothing else than a rollercoaster ride. Big announcements, back-and-forth action, and a lot of volatility and uncertainty – it seems more has happened in the last 2 months than in many longer periods in history. In today’s blog, we take a look at all that occurred since the inauguration of President Trump, how it affected the markets, and maybe several lessons that can be taken away for the future.

First of all, a small disclaimer. The opinions expressed in this blog, especially the forward-looking statements, are based on how the situation has developed thus far, but also historically in similar situations of turbulence. This does not mean that it will develop as presented, and as such, it should not be taken as investment advice.

VIX index change (2020 – 2025 YTD, points)

Source: Bloomberg, InterCapital Research

At the moment that President Trump took office on 20 January 2025, the volatility index, VIX, stood at approximately. 15 points, as the new administration and its promises ushered a new wave of optimism for the US, but also the world. President Trump promised sweeping changes, and while many of them were announced, we will focus on the ones impacting the equity markets the most.

The Historical Background

President Trump’s agenda revolves around two core ideas: “America First” and “Make America Great Again.” Viewed through this lens, the recent turbulent events are not surprising despite the resulting uncertainty. Early on, Trump pledged unprecedented tariffs targeting countries he believes have economically exploited the U.S. Additionally, he vowed to revive American manufacturing, a sector weakened over decades as U.S. companies shifted production overseas, especially to fast-growing economies like China, attracted by lower costs.

Secondly, over the past several decades, the U.S. economy expanded significantly, achieving one of the highest GDP per capita levels globally – comparable even to smaller, wealthier nations. Unlike countries whose wealth primarily stemmed from commodities (e.g., Gulf countries, Norway), trade, position, finances (e.g., Singapore, Switzerland), or favorable tax policies (e.g., Ireland, small island nations), the U.S. grew mainly due to its robust services sector, consumer spending, and diversification into numerous industries. This economic growth led to higher wages, making domestic manufacturing comparatively less profitable, further accelerating the shift of production overseas.

Cheap labor – particularly in many Asian countries – has been a key driver behind the offshoring of U.S. manufacturing. As production shifted to lower-cost regions, companies continued selling goods back to the U.S., contributing to large trade deficits, especially in goods. While this is a broad generalization, it reflects the trend targeted by the current administration, which has focused heavily on goods trade. In contrast, the U.S. maintains a strong services trade surplus, exporting $1.1tn and importing $814bn in 2024 – a $293bn surplus. The U.S. leads globally, with services in sectors such as business, professional, and technical services, finance, travel, telecom, IT, and intellectual property (e.g., royalties and licensing). This was the (short) historical background of the US upon President Trump’s inauguration in January 2025.

The Opening Moves

Upon taking office in January, President Trump announced 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico (starting February 1) and a 10% tariff on China, citing border security and the fentanyl crisis. Markets reacted mildly at first, as expectations of tax cuts and deregulation were seen as offsetting these early trade threats. Another brief episode involved a threatened 25% tariff on Colombia after it refused to accept deported migrants – a dispute resolved within hours.

At the month’s end, the Federal Reserve held rates steady at 4.25% to 4.50%. Chair Jerome Powell maintained a cautious tone, noting solid economic growth but elevated inflation. While tariff details were still unfolding, Powell acknowledged they could temporarily raise inflation and slow growth, though his comments didn’t surprise the market.

Meanwhile, Q4 2024’s GDP grew at an annualized 2.3%, driven by consumer spending, which rose at its fastest pace in nearly two years. Many businesses reported a spike in demand from Americans preemptively buying goods ahead of the expected tariffs. The market welcomed the data, but uncertainty lingered. Still, volatility remained contained, with the VIX holding in the mid-teens.

In early February, the U.S. delayed its 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico by 30 days to allow room for negotiations, but the 10% tariff on Chinese imports took effect on February 4. China responded swiftly, imposing 15% tariffs on LNG, coal, and certain vehicles, and launching an anti-trust investigation into Google. These measures were set to begin February 10. This marked the first major spike in market volatility – widely seen as the formal restart of the U.S. – China trade war. Companies with significant China exposure, particularly in the tech and industrial sectors, declined in value, and the VIX surged into the mid-to-high 20s, reflecting mounting investor anxiety.

Furthermore, the January jobs report showed fewer jobs added than expected, and inflation came in higher than forecast, prompting speculation that the Fed might keep interest rates elevated for longer. This fueled trading activity and helped keep the VIX at elevated levels. On February 10, the U.S. expanded its tariff regime, removing steel import exemptions and raising aluminum tariffs from 10% to 25%, effective in March.

Just days later, on February 13, President Trump introduced his plan for reciprocal tariffs, pledging to match foreign tariff rates with equivalent U.S. measures. Although Q4 earnings were generally strong, the combination of rising trade tensions and monetary policy uncertainty weighed on sentiment. The S&P 500 moved sideways while volatility increased, reflecting investors’ unease about the unfolding policy landscape.

Despite mounting trade tensions, the S&P 500 reached an all-time high on February 19, supported by solid earnings and continued optimism around Trump’s business-friendly policies. Volatility remained moderate, with the VIX hovering in the mid-teens, as domestic policy hopes helped offset rising external risks.

Investors largely viewed Trump’s aggressive trade stance as a negotiation tactic rather than a lasting shift, especially as tariffs on Canada and Mexico were extended beyond early February. Still, the market began showing signs of caution – defensive sectors like consumer staples and utilities outperformed while high-growth sectors started to lag, signaling early positioning for potential volatility ahead.

The Start of the Escalation

On February 27, President Trump announced that the 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico would take effect on March 4, citing insufficient efforts to curb drug flows. He also stated that China’s tariff rate would double to 20%. This marked the turning point for markets, as hopes for productive negotiations were abruptly replaced by a hardline stance. Markets reacted sharply: the S&P 500 fell 1.6%, the Nasdaq dropped 2.8%, and the VIX jumped 10% to 21 points, signaling a spike in investor anxiety. That same day, Nvidia, despite strong Q4 results, issued a weaker-than-expected revenue forecast due to global demand uncertainty, sending its stock down 8.5% and adding to the broader sell-off.

The late February sell-off wiped out approximately $3tn in market value in just over a week. The VIX rose by 40% from the start of the month, settling in the low 20s as volatility became more entrenched. On March 4, the U.S. imposed 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, though Canadian energy exports were capped at 10%. Canada had already prepared retaliatory tariffs on over $100bn of US goods, while Mexico issued warnings of a similar response, though it left the door open for negotiations.

China reacted to the 20% U.S. tariff hike by imposing 15% duties on U.S. agricultural products, expanding export controls on critical minerals, and blacklisting dozens of American firms. The European Union, alarmed by U.S. moves on steel, aluminum, and reciprocal tariffs, drafted countermeasures targeting $28bn worth of U.S. goods, though implementation was delayed until mid-April in hopes of de-escalation.

While markets initially reacted negatively, sentiment briefly stabilized on March 5-6 after President Trump granted 1-month exemptions for auto supply chains and delayed tariffs on Canada and Mexico for goods complying with USMCA rules of origin. These gestures, along with ongoing talks, led to a cautious rebound.

The Back-and-Forth Action

However, the calm was short-lived. On March 10, the S&P 500 dropped 2.7% and the Nasdaq 4%, pushing the S&P down 8.6% from its record high and erasing approximately $4tn in market value. The Nasdaq fell over 10% from its peak, while the VIX surged into the mid-20s. The constant policy swings and unpredictability unsettled both investors and consumers, reinforcing the sense of growing uncertainty.

Further developments followed as President Trump met with business leaders in an attempt to ease concerns, though he maintained a defiant tone. By then, the S&P 500 was down over 5% year-to-date, with the DJIA and Nasdaq falling even more. By this point, the VIX index had climbed nearly 85% since the inauguration.

A modest rally occurred on March 12 after February inflation data came in below expectations, offering temporary relief. Still, by this point, the tariff outlook had begun to overshadow macroeconomic data. On March 19, the Fed held interest rates steady, with Chair Jerome Powell acknowledging that the economy was leaning toward slower growth and temporarily higher inflation. He emphasized that the Fed wouldn’t overreact but stood ready to adjust policy if needed – offering some reassurance to jittery markets.

In late March, the administration announced new tariffs, including a 25% duty on any country purchasing oil or gas from Venezuela and a 25% tariff on imported cars and car parts, effective April 3, to protect U.S. manufacturers. Markets declined further in response: the S&P 500 was down 10% from its peak, the Dow about 10%, and the Nasdaq 14%. The VIX fluctuated between 20 and 30 as heightened volatility became the “new normal.” Numerous smaller policy shifts and retaliatory signals during this period only added to the growing uncertainty.

“Liberation Day” and Its Effects

Then, the big bazooka was finally announced. On April 2nd, President Trump announced baseline tariffs of 10% on all imports to the U.S., along with even higher country-specific rates. Asian countries were hit especially hard – China received a 34% tariff (on top of the existing 20%, now totaling 54%), 20% on EU imports, 24% on Japan, 25% on South Korea, and 32% on Taiwan, among others. Canada and Mexico were also included, each facing 25% tariffs.

The size of these tariffs exceeded even the most bearish forecasts, and as such, a stock market plunge followed. On April 3rd, the S&P 500 dropped 4.8% and the Nasdaq by 6% – the biggest single-day losses since June 2020 and March 2020, respectively. S&P 500 companies lost a staggering $2.4 trillion in value in just one day, while the VIX spiked above 40, briefly touching 60 points intraday.

Gold prices surged, along with other safe-haven assets like Treasuries and the Japanese yen. The U.S. dollar, however, fell against most other currencies. The tech sector was hit especially hard – Apple lost over 9%, and Nvidia lost 8%. And the selloff wasn’t limited to the U.S.; markets across Asia and Europe posted steep losses. Even typically steadier local markets like Slovenia and Croatia recorded drops on par with broader European declines.

It didn’t take long to see responses. China imposed 34% tariffs on U.S. exports, prompting Trump to counter with an additional 50% on top of existing tariffs, leading to app. 104% tariff rate on China. Other countries reacted in mixed fashion – some began planning retaliatory tariffs, while others held out hope for renewed talks.

After the latest round of U.S. tariffs on China, Beijing raised total tariffs on U.S. goods to 84%, introduced more export controls on rare earth elements, blacklisted additional US companies, and initiated regulatory investigations into US companies operating in China. As a result of this, President Trump increased the overall China tariff to 125%.

Relief to the Market

On April 9, President Trump announced a 90-day pause on all tariffs above 10%, giving time for negotiations. He noted that many affected countries had already sent teams to work on new trade deals. However, he remained firm on China, even increasing the levies on China to 145%.

The move triggered the biggest market rally in recent memory: the DJIA jumped 7.9%, the S&P 500 rose 9.5%, and the Nasdaq Composite surged 12.2%. Just hours before the announcement, Trump posted on Truth Social: “BE COOL! Everything is going to work out well. The USA will be bigger and better than ever before!” followed by “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! DJT”.

The latest news includes the exemption of certain electronic products, such as smartphones, laptops, etc., from the tariffs, even from countries such as China, but this, the US Commerce Secretary said, was only temporary.

S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq Composite performance (2020 – 2025, January 2020=0, %)

Source: Bloomberg, InterCapital Research

Going Forward

Without trying to predict the future, maybe several lessons could be learned from this.

Firstly, the markets do not like uncertainty, especially when it comes to things that could, in a very short period of time have a strong effect on everyone, from businesses and consumers to entire countries and their outlook.

Secondly, as stated several times about the President by his close aides, the moves made by the President are not random and are a calculated strategy, even if we do not have a direct view of how that strategy is formulated. What we can look at, however, is the overall goal from the lens mentioned at the beginning of this blog. The moves, while hugely disruptive, did put the US in a better negotiating position. Furthermore, it is likely that other countries will take what the President says more seriously, which could lead to less back-and-forth and more negotiation moving forward.

Thirdly, short-term uncertainty and volatility cannot be ruled out going forward, but as the last couple of weeks have shown us, while the markets react swiftly, this was more due to uncertainty related to the actions taken, and maybe in part because of their expectations that all these threats would not materialize in the end. However, the President did say throughout his years, during the election, as well as after being elected, that choosing actions that best suit the US is his course of action. The US economy has many issues that it needs to fix, and thus, radical moves could be expected. Maybe it’s a matter of perspective then – many politicians make a lot of promises, many of which do not get done, especially after facing backlash. This is the truth across all the democratic countries. As such, maybe the best advice that can be given is to take note of what the President says, especially when it aligns with some long-term goal, and in particular, “Make America Great Again”, and then position accordingly.

Mihael Antolić
Published
Category : Blog

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

Solid at Home, Shaky Abroad: Croatia’s Tourism Balances on Global Trends

Croatian tourism entered 2025 with momentum, but Q1 results reflect a sector navigating between domestic resilience and global fragility. January brought encouraging growth, particularly from domestic travelers, while March revealed the weight of external pressures—from economic slowdowns in key markets to political uncertainty across Europe. In this quarterly review, we explore not just the headline figures but the deeper structural forces at play: is this performance the result of sound long-term strategy or simply short-term inertia riding on favorable global currents? As always, we leave that judgment to you.

In the first quarter of 2025, according to data from the e-Visitor system, foreign tourist arrivals totaled 572k, marking a notable decline of 16.55% compared to Q1 2024. In contrast, domestic tourist arrivals rose by 6.66%, reaching 463k. During the same period, foreign overnight stays amounted to 1.75m, representing a significant decrease of 15.67% YoY, while domestic overnight stays slightly increased to 999k, reflecting a 3.35% growth. In total, domestic and foreign arrivals combined reached 1.03m, down 7.54% YoY, with overall overnight stays amounting to 2.74m, a decline of 9.61% compared to the same period last year.

The data confirms a clear decline in Q1 for foreign tourist arrivals and overnight stays, down 16.55% and 15.67%, respectively. In contrast, domestic tourism recorded modest but stable growth, reflecting a positive shift in local demand. Traditionally viewed as less accessible to the domestic population, tourism is now showing signs of improved affordability—supported by recent fiscal measures, wage growth, and broader economic expansion. While this doesn’t imply that holidays are now broadly affordable for all residents, the increase in both domestic arrivals and overnight stays signals a meaningful and encouraging trend.

A breakdown of monthly performance shows that January was the only month to record growth across all major indicators compared to 2024. Domestic arrivals increased by 8% and overnight stays by 5%, while foreign arrivals rose by 10% and overnight stays by 7%. This positive start was largely driven by tourists visiting Croatia to celebrate the New Year and take advantage of the winter holiday season. In February, foreign arrivals declined slightly by 6%, with overnight stays down 3%, while domestic arrivals and overnight stays maintained a growth of 8% and 5%, respectively. March, however, brought a massive downturn in foreign tourism, with both arrivals and overnight stays falling by 29%, reflecting economic uncertainty and the impact of increasingly shaky global political conditions. Still, domestic tourism remained resilient, posting a 5% rise in arrivals and a modest 1% growth in overnight stays — a sign of stable, home-driven demand even amid wider instability.

Total tourist arrivals and nights in Croatia (March 2019 – March 2025)

Source: HTZ, InterCapital Research

During the January–March period, 92% of overnight stays were recorded in commercial accommodation, while non-commercial accommodation—referring to stays in private holiday homes outside the formal market—accounted for 7%, and nautical tourism made up the remaining 1%. Within the commercial segment, hotels accounted for the largest share with 60% of total traffic, followed by private family accommodation at 25%, campsites at 3%, and others at 12%. While nautical tourism continues to grow in strategic importance, its contribution during the winter months remains marginal, as expected, given the pronounced seasonality of this segment.

Domestic tourists accounted for the largest share of overnight stays in the January–March period, making up 36% of the total, followed by visitors from Slovenia (10%), Austria, Germany, and Bosnia and Herzegovina (6% each), with Serbia contributing 4%.
In terms of regional performance, Istria recorded the highest number of overnight stays at 630k, reaffirming its role as a classic winter escape known for its mild climate, excellent gastronomy, wine culture, and serene natural surroundings—an appealing choice for off-season relaxation. Istria was followed by Kvarner (481k), Zagreb (462k), Splitsko-Dalmatinska County (284k), and Dubrovačko-Neretvanska County (192k). At the lower end of the spectrum were Koprivničko-Križevačka (8.2k), Virovitičko-Podravska (9k), and Požeško-Slavonska (12.7k) counties, which continue to attract limited tourism activity in the winter season.

The year 2019 remains widely regarded as a benchmark for Croatian tourism, especially by the media, and is often cited as the record year that is difficult to surpass. When comparing Q1 2025 with Q1 2019, we observe solid positive developments overall. Total tourist arrivals increased by 8%, while total overnight stays rose by 15%. Foreign tourist arrivals were the only segment still in decline, down 10% compared to Q1 2019. In contrast, domestic arrivals surged by 42%, underscoring strong momentum and improved affordability among local travelers. This domestic strength contributed significantly to the overall +8% growth in total arrivals. Looking at overnight stays, foreign tourists recorded a 10% increase, while domestic overnights jumped by 27%, bringing total growth in overnight stays to +15% versus Q1 2019.

We will also highlight the latest data from the Croatian Bureau of Statistics, which reinforces overall travel activity trends. In February 2025, total passenger traffic at Croatian airports reached 320 thousand, representing a 9.2% increase YoY. Zagreb Airport accounted for the majority of this traffic with 259 thousand passengers (+6.8% YoY), which is not unusual for the winter period, followed by Split Airport with 34 thousand (+19.1%) and Dubrovnik Airport with 22 thousand passengers, showing a notable rise of 26.1%. The most significant volume of international air traffic was recorded with German airports, reaching 71 thousand passengers—a 10.7% increase compared to the same month last year. Meanwhile, freight traffic declined by 6.8%, totaling 673 tonnes.

Despite the steep decline in March, which pulled down overall Q1 performance, domestic demand proved to be a stabilizing factor. Positive signals in this segment are particularly encouraging—not only for the tourism sector but for the wider Croatian economy and its citizens. Backed by a solid macroeconomic backdrop, Croatia enters the main season with rising wages, above-average GDP growth, strong connectivity, and, notably, according to the latest Eurostat data, the highest level of safety among EU member states. Combined with a relatively low migrant burden and Croatia’s widely recognized natural appeal, the country holds a strong position in a highly competitive environment. Of course, inflation and price sensitivity remain key concerns. Last year’s season performed well despite media attention on pricing, but the question remains on how both tourists and domestic entrepreneurs will position themselves this year. Government measures aimed at curbing excessive prices—particularly in the housing and rental market—are underway, but their effects are not immediate and will become clearer only during or after the summer season. It is clear that high inflation is unattractive to tourists, and pricing will continue to be under scrutiny.

Beyond internal dynamics, external macroeconomic conditions—particularly in Western Europe—will play a decisive role. Growth remains sluggish across core EU markets, with elevated inflation, rising layoffs, and political instability shaping a challenging environment. Croatia, like the rest of the region, is not immune to these global shifts. We are situated on uncertain ground, where the trajectory of global trade disputes and geopolitical tensions could push Europe closer to recession. In this context, the performance of Croatia’s tourism sector will not only reflect global trends but could also influence domestic economic momentum in the months ahead. What is clear, however, is that a range of factors—both supportive and potentially disruptive—will shape performance. As the global environment remains volatile, Croatian tourism will continue to reflect that uncertainty, for better or worse.

Damian Bhaskar
Published
Category : Flash News

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

Romania: Inflation and Wages Overview

In March, Romania recorded a 0.3% MoM increase in CPI, with annual inflation reaching 4.9%, while HICP stood at 5.1%. This reflects Romania’s easing but still ongoing battle with inflation. On the other hand, compared to January, average net earnings increased 0.4% in February, reflecting wage stickiness which is expected to continue exert upward pressure on inflation.

Compared to the previous month, March saw another increase in consumer prices, with the CPI rising by 0.27% compared to February. On an annual basis, inflation in March stood at 4.9%, reflecting a slight decline of 0.1 p.p. from the previous month. Additionally, the 12-month average inflation rate (April 2024 – March 2025) compared to the preceding 12 months registered a 5.1% increase, marking a 0.1 p.p. decrease from February’s 12-month average. This decline reflecting inflation slowing down can also be attributed to the exclusion of March 2024 from the calculation, when CPI reached 6.6%.

Romanian CPI YoY growth rate (January 2019 – March 2025, %)

Source: Romanian National Bank, InterCapital Research

Breaking down the data, services registered the highest annual increase at 7%, followed by food goods at 5.1% and non-food goods at 3.8%. On a monthly basis, services prices rose by 0.9%, food prices by 0.8%, while non-food goods experienced a 0.3% price decrease.

Turning to the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP), used for cross-country comparisons within the EU, Romania posted a 0.34% monthly increase and an annual rate of 5.1% in March 2025. Although it is a decrease of 0.1 p.p. compared to last month’s annual rate, this level remains above Euro area countries, underscoring Romania’s ongoing challenge with elevated inflation, mixed with high public deficit which is also used to cap the energy prices.

HICP YoY change for elected EU countries (March 2025, %)

Source: Eurostat, InterCapital Research

Regarding wages, the average net earnings in February 2025 stood at RON 5,351, reflecting a 0.4% increase compared to January. For the economic sector, industries leading the growth of net earnings were manufacture of tobacco products, financial and insurance services. On the other hand, manufacture of basic metals and mining of metal ores are some of the industries which recorded decreases of average net earnings, determined by the occasional bonuses, production un-achievements or lower receipts, as well as hiring staff with lower earnings as against the average. As for the budgetary sector, the average net earnings increased as against the previous month in public administration (+0.8%), while decreases were recorded in human health and social work activities (-1.8%) and education (-1.1%).

Evolution of net average earnings (February 2024 – February 2025, RON)

Source: Romanian National Institute of Statistics, InterCapital Research

Marin Orel
Published
Category : Flash News

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

Navigating Uncertainty: Key Economic Developments and U.S. Monetary Policy

As a week filled with significant developments and important data comes to a close, we can take a moment to analyze the numbers. While the uncertainty surrounding tariffs seems to be easing, the broader uncertainty about the future direction of the U.S. economy continues to grow. Will the Federal Reserve maintain its current interest rate regime? Will Jerome Powell’s successor alter the course of existing Fed policies? And is the U.S. economy truly heading toward a stagflationary spiral?

President Trump finally announced his long-awaited package of retaliatory tariffs last week. The basic 10% rate came into effect on April 5th, while the individual rates are set to take effect on April 9th. Among the more notable measures are 10% tariffs on imports from the United Kingdom, 20% on the European Union (with 25% tariffs being imposed on car and car part imports), and 24% on imports from Japan. China faces an additional 34% tariff on top of the already existing 20%. Canada and Mexico, however, are excluded from this tariff package. As a result, markets reacted sharply, with the S&P 500 dropping -9.08% for the week and the NASDAQ Composite Index falling -10.02%. In Europe, the STOXX 600 slid 8.44% for the week. The Euro strengthened against the U.S. dollar, with EUR/USD rising by 1.83% (-183 bps) the day after the tariff announcement, signaling heightened economic uncertainty in the U.S. As the dollar weakened and concerns about potential rate cuts grow, the U.S. yield curve steepened across the board. The day after the tariff announcement, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield saw a decline of 2.49% (-249bps), while the 2-year Treasury yield fell by 4.61% (-461bps), reflecting growing concerns about the U.S. economy.

S&P 500 (left axis) & Nasdaq (right axis) Indices (2 January 2025 – last closing price, points)

Source: Bloomberg, InterCapital

US 10-year bond yield (left axis, %), EUR/USD exchange rate (right axis, units of dollars per 1 euro), (2 January 2025 – last closing price)

Source: Bloomberg, InterCapital

Turning to the labor market, last Thursday’s Initial Jobless Claims came in at 219K, slightly below expectations (forecast: 225K), signaling a positive trend in the labor market despite recent turbulent events. The Services PMI exceeded expectations, coming in at 54.4 (forecast: 54.3), indicating business optimism and suggesting increased demand in the services sector. Looking at Friday’s data, Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) came in at 228K (forecast: 137K), and the Unemployment Rate stood at 4.2% (forecast: 4.1%), slightly above the consensus estimates. Overall, the positive macroeconomic indicators suggest a stable economic outlook, but the introduction of tariffs raises questions about the future of a “soft landing,” inflation, and the Federal Reserve’s subsequent policy decisions.

Despite President Trump’s assurances that the impact of the tariffs will be short-lived, the Federal Reserve will likely need to exercise increased caution in light of recent developments. In his speech last week, Jerome Powell highlighted positive macroeconomic data but emphasized that the Fed will await greater clarity before making further decisions. As a result, according to the Bloomberg analyst consensus, market expectations for rate cuts are steadily rising, even though the Fed is likely to adopt a more cautious and restrictive stance in the near future. Investors will remain on edge, as it remains uncertain whether the effects of the tariffs will be truly transitory or could potentially lead to a recession.

InterCapital
Published
Category : Blog

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

Q1 2025 is Over, How Did ZSE and LJSE Perform?

Today, we’re bringing you an overview of the ZSE and LJSE, how the trading activity went, and how the stocks performed in the first quarter of 2025.

Croatia

Starting off with Croatia, the total equity turnover during Q1 2025 amounted to EUR 157.8m, while excluding blocks, it amounted to EUR 123m. In terms of the average daily turnover, it stood at EUR 1.98m, an increase of 37% compared to the same quarter last year. One other noteworthy thing to mention is the ETF turnover, which amounted to EUR 14.6m during Q1, representing approximately 11.8% of the entire equity turnover (excl. blocks). The increase in the investments in ETFs is also visible on the YoY basis, as the ETF turnover during the same period last year amounted to EUR 5.9m, representing app. 6.4% of the total equity turnover (excl. blocks). In other words, the ETF turnover has more than doubled in absolute value and almost doubled as a % of the total equity turnover. In the current period, with a lot of uncertainty, ETFs offer several advantages: lower costs, diversification, and “access” to dividends that are reinvested instead of taxed. Judging by the numbers, this is something that was recognized by investors on the ZSE, which is certainly positive news, as more and more people are investing in financial instruments, although the majority of the investments are made into risk, but also low return bonds or treasury bills.

Monthly equity turnover on ZSE (January 2024 – March 2025, EURm)

Source: ZSE, InterCapital Research

Coming back to equity, from the numbers, we can also see that there was an above-average level of investments made in January, with a total equity turnover of EUR 71.8m, before decreasing to between EUR 41m and EUR 45m during February and March, respectively. This means that for each respective month, an increase was recorded as compared to the same period last year.

However, looking at the turnover itself does not tell the whole story, and a deeper look at which companies actually drove that turnover is prudent. In terms of the most traded stocks, Končar stood in the first place with EUR 20.7m, representing app. 17% of the entire turnover on the exchange. If we take into account Končar D&ST (both ordinary and preferred), which had turnovers of EUR 9.4m and EUR 7.9m, respectively, this would mean that Končar and its subsidiary accounted for app. 31% of the entire turnover on the exchange. In terms of the other stocks, HT recorded a turnover of EUR 9.3m, followed by ZABA at EUR 9m and Valamar Riviera at EUR 8.46m. In total, the top 10 most traded stocks accounted for 68% of the entire equity turnover on the exchange.

Performance of CROBEX10 constituents (Q1 2025, %)

Source: Bloomberg, InterCapital Research

In terms of the performance of the Croatian blue chips, the biggest increase during Q1 was recorded by Span, which grew by 9.3%, followed by HT at 8.2%, Valamar Riviera at 6.9%, Adris grupa (pref.) at 6.8%, and Končar D&ST at 6.7%. For Span, the growth was driven by improved financial results, including better margins, as large investments that the Company made into employees are starting to bear fruit. Furthermore, the Company’s stock was under pressure last year due to these higher investments, which affected margins, so the growth here could also be seen as a “recovery”. HT’s increase was a continuation of the Company’s stable business results, with revenue, EBITDA, and net income all recording improvements during 2024.

Valamar Riviera also recorded solid stock price growth, supported by some of the biggest investments both in Croatia, but also in the Company’s history into new, luxury hotels, as well as continued upgrades to the current portfolio. A similar situation was present with Adris, and as its preferential stock is usually more liquid (and is part of the CROBEX10 index), the price increase was present here. Besides large investments (such as Marjan Hotel in Split), Adris’ other segments, such as insurance, also performed well. Lastly, Končar D&ST has been the star of Končar Group in general, with its transformers segment recording high demand, a large backlog, and higher margins, which is expected to continue going forward and has fueled much of the subsidiary’s, but also Končar’s, growth. Končar is also worth mentioning here, as it was just below its subsidiary at 5% growth in Q1, also supported by high growth in revenue, EBITDA, and net income. Lastly, ING-GRAD, the latest IPO on ZSE, has (since 10 March 2025, when it debuted on the ZSE), recorded a modest 3.3% growth, supported by the high interest by investors during its IPO, but also good business results, that by looking at the backlog alone, would bring in significant revenue & EBITDA, and net income improvements in the next 2 years, at the very least.

On the other hand, HPB’s stock suffered the most, with an 8.8% decrease in Q1 2025. This was to be expected, as the ECB started decreasing interest rates, which, while it takes time, signals that loan interest rates will have to decrease as well. Other listed banks, such as ZABA, are in a similar predicament, although ZABA positioned itself better as it is the market leader in Croatia. Overall, the pressure on the banking sector, both its fundamentals and the stock price, could be expected to continue in the coming period.

Slovenia

Turning our attention to Slovenia, the total equity turnover during Q1 2025 amounted to EUR 195.4m, while excluding blocks, it amounted to 166.8m. ETF turnover hasn’t picked up as much in Slovenia, representing only 1.8% of the total equity turnover, although this is a large (relative) improvement from 0.1% in 2024 and an even larger jump in absolute numbers – from EUR 135k to EUR 2.9m. In terms of the average daily turnover, it amounted to EUR 2.7m in Q1 2025, growing by 84% YoY.

Monthly equity turnover on LJSE (January 2024 – March 2025, %)

Source: LJSE, InterCapital Research

Moving on to the most traded stocks, Krka and NLB were the absolute champions, both standing far above the rest at EUR 71.1m and EUR 45.5m, respectively. In fact, this represents 43% and 27% of the total equity turnover, or combined, 70% of the total equity turnover! Of course, this doesn’t come as a surprise, as the equity market in Slovenia is far more concentrated, with many times fewer companies than in Croatia listed on the exchange. Moving on, Petrol recorded a turnover of EUR 17m, representing 10% of the total turnover, followed by Sava Re and Triglav at EUR 8.9m and EUR 8.8m, or 5% of the total each, respectively. If we look at the top 10 companies, they recorded an equity turnover of EUR 163.6m, representing over 98% of the total equity turnover on the exchange.

Performance of SBITOP constituents (Q1 2025, %)

Source: Bloomberg, InterCapital Research

In terms of the actual performance of the Slovenian blue chips, all except one recorded a double-digit growth rate in Q1 2025. Petrol led the way at 35.9% growth, as the Company finally recorded better and recovering results after 2 years in a very uncertain and expensive energy market. Following them was Krka, which experienced a 23% increase as the company continued to expand across all regions, with improved revenue, EBITDA, and profitability numbers. Sava Re also recorded good financial results. Next up is Telekom Slovenije, a 19% growth in Q1, supported also by good financial results, but also by speculation about a possible separation of its telecommunication tower network into another company, which could improve costs & profitability. As of right now, however, this only remains speculation.

On the other hand, Equinox recorded an increase of “only” 5.3% in Q1, supported also by better business results, while NLB grew by 10.6%. NLB’s profits were under pressure during FY 2024 due to the higher levels of impairments and the balance sheet tax, while the net interest margin largely stabilized. However, this was offset by strong loan & deposit growth, which allowed the Group to expand its NII, NFCI, and net banking income. Furthermore, the Group recently also announced its intention to pay out a higher dividend this year (50% of 2024’s net profit, app. EUR 12.86 DPS), which also supported results. Given the fact that the Group is spread out across the SEE region, the hit on margins due to the reduction in interest rates hasn’t yet materialized. As such, the overall results were positive, leading to price appreciation.

Lastly, taking a look at the main blue-chip indices in Croatia and Slovenia, CROBEX10 and SBITOP, they recorded increases of 4.4% and 21.3% during Q1 2025.

Mihael Antolić
Published
Category : Flash News

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

Croatia and Slovenia CPI Data for March 2025

As of March 2025, Croatia recorded a CPI increase of 3.2% YoY and a 0.4% MoM rise, indicating a continued easing of inflationary pressures compared to earlier months, though momentum persists. The slowdown is visible on both an annual and monthly basis, suggesting a gradual cooling phase. In contrast, Slovenia posted a CPI increase of 2.0% YoY and 0.6% MoM, placing it broadly in line with the ECB’s inflation target. This reflects a more balanced inflation environment, supported by contained domestic demand and effective macroeconomic policy coordination.

Croatia

Based on the latest CPI data from the Croatian Bureau of Statistics, the downward trend in the annual inflation rate has continued, decreasing by 0.4 p.p. to 3.2% in March, down from 3.6% in February. On a monthly basis, the index recorded a slight increase of 0.4%.

Following a persistent rise in CPI from September 2024 to February 2025—driven by strong wage growth, robust GDP expansion, and high employment levels—the economy has now entered a deceleration phase. Although inflation is on a downward trajectory, the current annual rate still reflects an unfavorable macroeconomic environment and remains under close scrutiny.

Croatian CPI YoY growth rate (March 2015 – March 2025, %)

Source: Croatian Bureau of Statistics, InterCapital Research

Disaggregating the data, the main contributor on an annual basis remains the services category, with a 6.0% increase. It is followed by food, beverages, and tobacco, up 4.4%, while energy posted a modest 2.1% rise. The only component to decline annually was non-food industrial goods excluding energy, which fell by 0.2%.

Conversely, this same component—non-food industrial goods excluding energy—was the biggest driver of the monthly CPI increase, rising 2.1% MoM. Services also contributed, with a 0.7% monthly increase. Meanwhile, energy and food, beverages, and tobacco both declined on a monthly basis, by 1.2% and 0.2%, respectively.

Slovenia

According to data from the Slovenian Statistical Office, the annual CPI increased by 2.0% YoY in March 2025, marking a further deceleration from 3.6% in March 2024. On a monthly basis, consumer prices rose by 0.6%. With March 2025 inflation at 2.0% YoY, the country is exactly in line with the ECB’s target rate.

The key contributors to annual inflation were higher prices of food and non-alcoholic beverages, up by 3.5% YoY, contributing 0.7 p.p. to headline inflation. Services prices increased by 3.4% annually, while goods prices rose by 1.3%. Within the goods segment, semi-durable goods were 2.2% more expensive and non-durable goods rose by 1.7%, whereas durable goods saw a 0.8% annual decline.

Health-related services and the restaurant and hotel segment also had a notable impact, both contributing 0.3 p.p. to annual inflation, with prices up by 5.4% and 4.2%, respectively. Other categories that added 0.2 p.p. each included clothing and footwear (+2.5%), recreation and culture (+2.3%), miscellaneous goods and services (+2.3%), and transport (+1.0%). On the opposite side, the only significant drag on annual inflation came from housing, water, electricity, gas, and other fuels, where prices fell by 1.2%, subtracting 0.2 p.p. from the annual rate.

Slovenian CPI YoY growth rate (March 2015 – March 2025, %)

Source: SURS, InterCapital Research

On a monthly basis, CPI increased by 0.6%, primarily driven by higher prices of clothing and footwear, and electricity.

Clothing prices surged by 9.4% MoM due to the arrival of the spring-summer collection and the end of seasonal discounts, contributing 0.4 p.p. to the monthly inflation. Footwear prices rose by 5.9%, adding 0.1 p.p..

Electricity prices jumped 16.5% MoM, driving a 7.5% increase in the broader housing, gas, and energy group and contributing an additional 0.4 p.p. to the monthly CPI.

Smaller upward pressures came from outpatient services (+4.9%), other recreational items and equipment, including pets (+2.9%), and food (+0.7%), each contributing 0.1 p.p..

Offsetting the monthly inflation was a 14.8% decline in package holiday prices, which coincided with the end of the winter season and subtracted 0.6 p.p. from the index. Operation of personal transport equipment also had a slight negative impact, subtracting 0.1 p.p., as petrol and diesel prices dropped by 1.4%.

Harmonized index of consumer prices in the EU (HICP)

Croatia’s harmonised index of consumer prices (HICP) rose by 4.3% YoY in March 2025, slowing down from 4.8% in February. On a monthly basis, prices increased by 0.5%. The data signals stronger price momentum in Croatia relative to most regional peers, with annual inflation still exceeding the EU and EMU averages. In contrast, Slovenia’s HICP rose by 2.2% YoY in March, continuing its disinflation trend from 3.4% a year earlier. On a monthly basis, Slovenian HICP increased by 0.8%.

HICP YoY change for selected EU countries (March 2025, %)

Source: Eurostat, InterCapital Research

In March 2025, HICP inflation in the euro area stood at 2.2%, edging down slightly from the previous month. France recorded the lowest annual rate at 0.9%, while Estonia, Croatia, and Slovakia registered the highest, both at 4.3%. Slovenia’s inflation matched the euro area average at 2.2%, remaining notably below Croatia’s reading. Note that this flash update reflects the most recent data available at the time of publication.

Croatia’s inflation continues to run above the euro area average, reflecting persistent domestic price pressures despite signs of gradual easing. In contrast, Slovenia maintains a more balanced inflation profile, with price growth consistent with the broader objective of stability. While some eurozone members are experiencing clear disinflation, the regional picture remains mixed. Core components like services and food continue to drive underlying pressures, suggesting that the path back to full price stability will remain uneven across member states.

Damian Bhaskar
Published
Category : Flash News

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

BET – All About That Yield

As global equities bled red last week, driven by recession fears ignited post-Liberation Day and heightened geopolitical tension, the mood on the capital markets soured. With uncertainty clouding the global economic outlook, this week’s blog shifts toward something a bit more certain – dividend proposals from Romanian listed companies.

In the past weeks, constituents of Romania’s BET index have begun unveiling their proposed 2024 profit distributions. So far, 15 out of 20 index members have revealed their dividend plans. Do keep in mind: these are proposals pending approval at upcoming General Shareholder Meetings.

Proposed dividend per share of BET constituents (RON)

Source: Companies’ data, InterCapital Research

The largest BET constituent by index weight, Banca Transilvania [TLV RO] proposed a gross dividend of RON 1.73 per share, implying a 6% dividend yield and a total payout of RON 1.59bn, this corresponds to a 33.6% payout ratio. It’s worth noting that banks operate under strict regulatory frameworks, especially around Capital Adequacy Ratios (CAR). Banca Transilvania intends to maintain a CAR comfortably above 14% post-dividend, in line with its internal policy that links payout levels to expected ROE and regulatory buffers. The ex-date is June 13th, with payment on June 30th.

OMV Petrom’s [SNP RO] 2030 Strategy emphasizes a progressive dividend tied to financial performance and long-term resilience. It targets 5-10% annual DPS growth and a payout ratio of 40-70% of operating cash flow (OCF) – averaging around 50%. For 2024, the company proposed a total dividend of RON 2.77bn, reflecting a 66% payout ratio, and 42.8% of OCF. This equates to RON 0.04 DPS and a 6.1% yield. The ex-date is set for May 12th, while the payment date is June 3rd. OMV Petrom also announced intention to propose a special dividend in 2025.

Hidroelectrica [H2O RO] takes the crown in absolute terms: a whopping RON 4bn in proposed dividends, translating to a 98.7% payout ratio and RON 8.99 per share, with a 7.4% yield. The company’s dividend policy mandates a minimum 90% payout, provided this doesn’t impair funding for future investments – especially important given the state’s 80% ownership via the Ministry of Energy.

Romgaz [SNG RO] proposed RON 0.16 DPS, translating to a 2.6% dividend yield. The total dividend amounts to RON 604m, of which RON 584m stems from 2024 profits and RON 20m from retained earnings. The ex-date is July 3rd, while the payment date is July 25th.

Like in Banca Transilvania’s case, BRD’s [BRD RO] dividend policy is shaped by capital requirements, such as CET1. Therefore, BRD proposed a RON 737m dividend payout, equal to 50% payout ratio, RON 1.06 DPS and a 5.8% yield. The ex-date is May 12th, payment date May 22nd.

Back to energy sector companies which are abundant among the BET constituents. Transgaz [TGN RO] adheres to a minimum 50% payout policy. For 2024, the company proposed a RON 203.5m dividend payment, which implies a 52% payout, RON 1.08 DPS and a 3.8% yield. The ex-date is set for June 24th and payment date for July 16th.

Moving on, Nuclearelectrica [SNN RO]proposed a RON 2.7 DPS, equaling a 6.7% yield. Total dividend amounts to RON 815.2m, or a 40% payout ratio, with ex-date being June 2nd and payment date June 24th.

Electrica’s [EL RO] proposed RON 0.18 DPS marks a 50% YoY increase, with a 1.4% yield. The payout reflects 16.5% of consolidated profit and 91% of individual net distributable profit. The ex-date is set for June 3rd, payment date for June 27th.

Transelectrica [TEL RO] announced RON 2.12 per share, implying a 4.8% yield. The total of RON 155.4m corresponds to a 50% payout from distributable profit, with the rest allocated to reserves. The ex-date is June 5th, payment date June 26th.

As for Fondul Proprietatea [FP RO], the company proposed RON 0.04 DPS, yielding 11.5%. the total distribution is RON 144m, with a 42.4% payout ratio, while the ex-date is May 27th and payment date is set for June 19th.

One United Properties [ONE RO] proposed a second dividend tranche of RON 0.36 per share, yielding 1.9%. Combined with the first tranche, the total RON 0.7 DPS yields 3.5%, with RON 77.8 allocated, translating to a 20.4% payout ratio. The company adheres to an “up to 35%” policy on net distributable profit. Notably, in December 2024, a 50:1 share consolidation occurred, raising nominal value per share from RON 0.2 to RON 10. The ex-date for the second tranche is set for May 20th, while the payment date is May 29th.

Aquila [AQ RO] proposed RON 0.05 DPS, yielding 3.6%, with a total payout of RON 50.8m – a 61.1% payout ratio. The ex-date is May 20th, payment date June 6th.

Antibiotice [ATB RO] proposed RON 0.02 DPS, yielding 0.9%, with a RON 13.8m dividend equating to a 13.5% payout ratio. Payment is set for October 8th, with the approval expected on April 15th, while the ex-date is to be determined.

Sphera Franchise Group [SFG RO] proposed RON 1.09 DPS, implying a 2.6% yield. This corresponds to RON 42.2m distribution and a 43.4% payout ratio. The ex-date is set for May 15th, payment date for June 6th.

Lastly, Transport Trade Services [TTS RO] proposed RON 0.16 DPS, implying a 3.8% yield and a 45% payout ratio, in line with the company’s dividend policy. The ex-date is May 23rd, payment date June 16th.

In the coming weeks, dividend proposals are expected from Digi Communications, Premier Energy and Purcari Wineris. Conversely, MedLife and TeraPlast are unlikely to announce distributions – MedLife does not have a dividend payout practice, while TeraPlast posted a negative net income for 2024.

Implied dividend yield of BET constituents (%)

Source: Companies’ data, InterCapital Research

As it stands, the BET index yield is 5.5%, and with a P/E of 8.3x, valuations remain compelling, especially compared to other CEE markets, making Romania an attractive equity market. Moreover, a pending bull factor is the probable reclassification from Frontier to Emerging (MSCI), which could soon shine a spotlight on Bucharest, attracting a broader base of global capital.

Marin Orel
Published
Category : Blog
Tags : , ,

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

Sava Re Proposes EUR 2.25 DPS

At the share price before the announcement, this would amount to a DY of 4.83%. The ex-date is 9 June.

The Supervisory Board and the Management Board of Sava Re have proposed a draft resolution to the GSM for the distribution of 2024 profit. In total, EUR 34.9m would be paid out as dividends, representing a payout ratio of 40%. This would amount to a gross dividend of EUR 2.25 per share, representing a 28.6% increase from the previous dividend (DY amounted to 5.9%). Finally, we note this is within the planned payout range of 35% – 45% of the total Group’s net profit.

At the same time, the remaining part of the distributable profit of EUR 21.6m would be left unallocated as retained earnings. At the share price before the announcement, the EUR 2.25 DPS would amount to a dividend yield of 4.83%. The ex-date and payment date are 9 June and 11 June, respectively.

Below we provide you with historic dividends per share and dividend yields of the Company.

Dividend per Share (EUR) and Dividend Yield (%) (2014 -2025)

Source: Sava Re, InterCapital Research

InterCapital
Published
Category : Flash News

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.

HT Proposes EUR 1.64 DPS

Yesterday, HT published its dividend proposal for 2025, in the amount of EUR 1.64 DPS. At the share price before the announcement, this would imply a DY of 3.8%. The ex-date is set for 6 June 2025, while the payment date is set for 16 June 2025.

Yesterday, HT’s Supervisory Board and Management Board meetings were held, and today a proposal for the distribution of the 2024 net profit was made. According to the proposal, EUR 126.1m will be paid out, while the remaining amount of EUR 10.7m will be transferred into retained earnings. This would imply a payout ratio of 92.2%.

On a per-share basis, this would mean that the dividend amounted to EUR 1.64, and at the share price before the announcement, this would imply a DY of 3.8%. This dividend represents an absolute increase of 7.2% compared to last year.

The ex-date is set for 6 June 2025, while the payment date is set for 16 June 2025. The approval of the dividend is subject to the vote at the GSM, which will be held on 3 June 2025. Lastly, for 2025, HT’s Management expects a dividend payment of at least EUR 1 DPS, but this will depend on several different parameters, which might have an influence on the dividend amount.

Below we provide you with a historical overview of the Company’s dividends per share (EUR) and dividend yields (%)

HT Group dividends per share (EUR) and dividend yields (%) (2009 – 2025)

Source: Hrvatski Telekom, Intercapital Research

InterCapital
Published
Category : Flash News

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.