IC Market Espresso 27 Jun 2019

 
Does CROATIA 2029 EUR Look Cheap to You Relative to the Rest of Curve?
Well, at first sight the paper does offer a couple of basis points in higher yield compared to CROATIA 2030 EUR, but a more thorough look at the modified duration might give You second thoughts. On the other hand, Croatian USD curve gets interesting only at the mid part (CROATIA 2021 USD) from the spread perspective.

Yesterday marked two full weeks of trading in brand new Croatian international bond – CROATIA 2029 EUR – and, oh boy, have we seen some price appreciation in rather a brief time frame. First of all, the paper was placed @ 1.324% YTM (MS+105bps/Bund+155.9bps) and looking at yesterday’s screen, you could easily see that the financial markets couldn’t get enough of it. Two weeks ago when the orderbook was open, the IPT stood @ MS+135bps (YTM @ 1.62%). As the orders were piling in, the IPTs were eventually cut all the way down to MS+105bps (YTM @ 1.324%); two weeks and two major dovish central banks later, the I-spread has been reduced to merely 89.3bps. Looking at the yield curve submitted below, CROATIA 2029 EUR is the second dot from the right on the black curve, and it’s traded @ 1.10% YTM

Source: Bloomberg

The question remains whether CROATIA 2029 EUR is fairly valued since looking at the yield curve you can easily see that the paper is still traded at a higher yield compared to CROATIA 2030 EUR – is the optics misleading? Well, it might be. First of all, CROATIA 2029 EUR has a slightly higher modified duration compared to CROATIA 2030 EUR. The reason behind this is the fact that modified duration represents nothing more than the cash-weighted time to maturity – since CROATIA 2029 EUR bears an annual coupon of just 1.125%, while CROATIA 2030 EUR carries 2.750% annually, the cash-weighted time to maturity of the first paper is a bit higher than that of the latter. In other words, with smaller regular coupons payments it takes longer to get your money back and you would want a higher discount to make the risk worthwhile. At current prices, the 29s have a modified duration of 9.39 years, while the 30s have a modified duration of 9.25 years. You can try this for Yourself using either Excel or Bloomberg – the latter with YAS function. Since higher modified duration spells higher volatility, this might explain why the investors prefer the 30s to 29s and hence the slight backwardation on the long end. Don’t worry, the curve is not broken – as a matter of fact it’s working exactly as it should be.

Source: Bloomberg

The differences in duration and yield are rather small, but if you thought that CROATIA 2029 EUR is mispriced because you can buy it in the Street at a higher yield to maturity compared to CROATIA 2030 – well think again. Also, the current spread curve (using German paper of the equivalent maturity as a benchmark) point out that 30s are traded at a slightly higher risk premium compared to the 29s. The spread curve also indicates that CROATIA 2027 EUR (122bps of risk premium versus Germany, the third dot from the left on the black curve) looks rather interesting since after this particular maturity the spread curve gets quite flat and doesn’t compensate the bearer of the paper with adequate premium for additional risk.

Source: Bloomberg

Looking at the dollar denominated international bonds, it’s obvious that the yield curve got flat on the front end and inverted on the longer segment. By taking a glance at the USD spread curve, CROATIA 2021 USD looks most attractive since it offers 66.4bps over USTs, which in these circumstances looks rather rich. Curious, isn’t it? But take one more look at the USD curves and you will get a good feeling of how the market is ticking – the front part of the yield curve (the first three dots from the left on the black curve) is rather flat, but since the UST curve is inverted, the spread curve gets steep on the front end.

Source: Bloomberg

What happens next? Well, first of all take a look at FFQ9 Comdty on Bloomberg (August FED fund futures, the contract expiring after FOMC), or simply click here. The contract implies merely one rate hike on July meeting (100 – 97.935 = 2.065% implied, the current band is @ 2.25%-2.50%) and this is mostly thanks to James Bullard giving financial markets a proper smack in the face by ending the wet dream of a 50bps rate cut on the upcoming meeting. We might be in a slowdown, but we’re not in a recession yet. Could this mean that the fixed income might be ready for a slight correction? It depends upon the actions of other global central banks, so watch for reactions from ECB and BOJ.    

Consolidation of the Slovenian Banking Sector Continues

The Slovenian Sovereign Holding announced the signing of the Sale and Purchase Agreement pursuant to which NKBM will acquire 100% of the shares of Abanka.

Last week, the Slovenian Sovereign Holding, as a representative of the Republic of Slovenia, announced the signing of the Sale and Purchase Agreement pursuant to which NKBM will acquire 100% of the shares held by the Republic of Slovenia in Abanka.

Abanka is Slovenia’s third-largest bank with around 9% of the market share by assets. The Bank was valued at EUR 511m (Total Consideration), including a dividend in the amount of EUR 67m which was paid out to the seller in May 2019, prior to the signing of the sale and purchase agreement. This would put the transaction at P/B of 0.99 and P/E of 7.79.

The closing of the transaction is subject to receiving all applicable authorisations and approvals from the relevant authorities.

NKBM is the second largest bank in Slovenia with around 15% of the market share by total assets. In 2016 NKBM was privatized, during which, Apollo Global Management, a private equity fund from the USA acquired 80% of the shares. It is noteworthy that the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development holds the other 20% stake.

The mentioned acquisition is particularly interesting as NKBM’s market share will increase closely to the one of NLB, which will put them competitively closer to NLB.

Share Price Reaction of Croatian & Slovenian Companies on Ex-Date

As some Croatian and Slovenian companies already went ex-date, we decided to see how much the share price reacted on the dividend being separated from the share.

Share Price Reaction of Croatian & Slovenian Companies on Ex-Date

*regarding the advance dividend

Of the companies which went ex-date, one can notice that most have recorded a share price decrease on the ex-date by approximately the same amount as the dividend yield generated by their dividend. However, some have observed a higher or lower share price change than their dividend yield. Of those, Sava Re observed a dividend yield higher than the share price drop on ex-date by 2.7 p.p. NLB follows with a dividend yield higher by 2.3 p.p. higher than the share price decrease on ex-date. Next comes Kraš, with a dividend yield higher by 1.6 p.p.

On the flip side, ZABA and Arena Hospitality Group observed a higher share price decrease on ex-date compared to their dividend yield. ZABA observed a 10.3% share price decrease, which is higher by 0.9 p.p. compared to their dividend yield. Meanwhile, Arena Hospitality Group recorded a 3.8% share price decrease on ex-date, which is by 2.3 p.p. higher than their dividend yield.

Ex-Date of Observed Croatian & Slovenian companies

wdt_ID Company Ex-Date
1 AD Plastik* 08-Mar
2 ZABA 16-Apr
3 Arena Hospitality Group 06-May
4 Valamar 15-May
5 HT 20-May
6 Kraš 05-Jun
7 Cinkarna Celje 10-Jun
8 Triglav 11-Jun
9 Sava Re 12-Jun
10 NLB 14-Jun
11 Ericsson NT 18-Jun
12 Končar 19-Jun

*regarding the advance dividend

Want to invest? Do not know how and where? Contact us and we will solve everything for you.